Compare peptides

Compare peptides

Choose any two compounds below to see them side by side. Each comparison page lines up the level of evidence behind each one, the registered clinical trials, and where each stands with regulators, so the differences are easy to see in one place.

This is a side-by-side of what is documented, not a ranking. Different compounds are studied for different things, in different people, at different amounts. A row that looks stronger for one compound does not make it the better choice for anyone.

HexarelinSermorelin
Highest evidence tier on the pageE1 Approved-label evidence
FDA or EMA approved labelling for a specific indication.
E5 Community-reported
Forums, circulated protocols, vendor material. Reported, not evidence.
Regulatory statusNot statedFormerly FDA approved (Geref, 1997-2008, voluntarily discontinued); not currently FDA approved; available via 503A compounding
Research areaGrowth hormone axisGrowth hormone axis
Regulator-approved dose on fileNo approved doseNo approved dose
Molecular formulaC47H58N12O6Not reliably established
Molar massApproximately 887.06 g/mol (free base).Not reliably established
CAS number140703-51-1 (free base, consistently cited across Biosynth, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, GlpBio, and ChemicalBook). A separate CAS number, 208251-52-9, applies to the acetate salt form ("hexarelin acetate"), per Cayman Chemical and other vendor listings — this is a distinct salt registration, not a conflicting identifier for the same substance.86168-78-7
Registered trials on this siteNone linked yetNone linked yet
What is not knownThis session could not independently retrieve the exact numeric doses used in the published human dose-response studies of hexarelin (for example, the studies associated with PubMed IDs 7957536, 8954038, and 7962341) from the primary articles during this research pass; the specific figures should be confirmed...Whether the wide range of claims commonly made for adult sermorelin use (cognition, sleep, skin, immune function, extended lifespan) hold up in controlled human trials. A vendor document supplied as background for this entry attributed all of these to unspecified "lab animal" studies without naming...

Full pages: Hexarelin and Sermorelin. See also the clinical trial tracker and how we grade evidence.

Educational reference, not medical advice. Trial data from ClinicalTrials.gov. Everything else is drawn from the compound pages on this site, each of which cites its sources.

Most requested comparisons

These are the pairings readers look for most often. Each opens a full side-by-side page.

Weight management compounds

Growth hormone related peptides

Repair and recovery

Longevity, mitochondria and brain

How to read a comparison

A side-by-side table can make two compounds look equally proven when they are not. Keep these points in mind as you read.

  • Evidence level matters more than the headline. Every compound is placed on the same six-tier scale, from published human clinical trials down to community reports. A compound with large human trials and one with only animal studies are not comparable, even when both appear in the same table.
  • Registered trials show what is being tested. A trial listed on ClinicalTrials.gov tells you a question is being studied, not that the answer is known. Check the status and phase. You can browse every tracked study on the clinical trial tracker and see recent registry updates in the trial changes feed.
  • Regulatory status is specific to a formulation and a country. Approval of one product does not mean every version of that compound is approved.
  • Different populations and doses limit direct comparison. Results from separate trials, run in different people over different periods, cannot be lined up as if they came from a head-to-head study unless a comparison page says a head-to-head study exists.

Frequently asked questions

Which compound is better?

These pages do not rank compounds or tell anyone what to use. They show what the published and registered evidence says about each one so you can see where the evidence is strong and where it is thin.

Why are some comparisons mostly empty on one side?

Many popular peptides have little or no human trial data. When that is the case, the comparison says so plainly rather than filling the gap with community claims.

Can I compare doses here?

Reported amounts are documented on each individual peptide page, with the source and evidence tier for every figure. If you need to work out concentrations, the reconstitution calculator is a math tool only and does not suggest an amount.

Where can I see every compound?

The full peptide library lists every entry,.

PeptideBlog is an educational reference compiled from public sources. It is not medical advice, and nothing here is a recommendation for or against any compound.